Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jcgo.org

Original Article

Volume 4, Number 4, December 2015, pages 302-306


Comparison of Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Gel for Induction in Prelabor Rupture of Membranes at Term

Tables

Table 1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics in Group I
 
CharacteristicMisoprostol (n = 25)Dinoprostone (n = 25)P value
Age (years)22.221.40.899
Gestational age (weeks)39400.500
Bishop’s score < 613180.145

 

Table 2. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics in Group II
 
CharacteristicMisoprostol (n = 25)Dinoprostone (n = 25)P value
Age25.626.10.566
Gestational age (weeks)39391
Bishop’s score < 617210.162

 

Table 3. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics
 
CharacteristicMisoprostol (n = 50)Dinoprostone (n = 50)P value
Age (years)23.0223.090.867
Gestational age38.4038.260.899
Bishop’s score < 630390.05

 

Table 4. Total Number of Doses Required for Induction in Group I
 
NumberMisoprostol group (n = 25)Dinoprostone group (n = 25)P value
NumberPercentageNumberPercentage
1197623920.122
2416280.384
328000.148
Oxytocin during labor5206240.732

 

Table 5. Total Number of Doses Required for Induction in Group II
 
NumberMisoprostol group (n = 25)Dinoprostone group (n = 25)P value
NumberPercentageNumberPercentage
1228821840.683
23124160.683
30000
Oxytocin during labor312280.637

 

Table 6. Induction to Delivery Interval in Group I
 
Total number of patientsInduction delivery interval (in h)P value
Misoprostol group257.748 ± 5.180.590
Dinoprostone group257.07 ± 3.46

 

Table 7. Induction to Delivery Interval in Group II
 
Total number of patientsInduction delivery interval (in h)P value
Misoprostol group255.55 ± 3.90.301
Dinoprostone group256.71 ± 3.8

 

Table 8. Induction to Delivery Interval in 100 Induced Patients
 
Total number of patientsInduction delivery interval (in h)P value
Misoprostol group506.652 ± 4.60.777
Dinoprostone group506.89 ± 3.6

 

Table 9. Mode of Delivery in Induced Patients in Group I
 
Mode of deliveryMisoprostol group (n = 25)Dinoprostone group (n = 25)P value
Cesarean section111.00
Vaginal delivery24241.00

 

Table 10. Mode of Delivery in Induced Patients in Group II
 
Mode of deliveryMisoprostol group (n = 25)Dinoprostone group (n = 25)
Cesarean section00
Vaginal delivery2525

 

Table 11. Maternal Adverse Effects
 
Adverse effectsMisoprostol groupDinoprostone groupP value
Nausea and vomiting120.557
Diarrhoea400.041
Hyperthermia120.557
Uterine tachysystole210.557
Chorioamnionitis111
Postpartum fever111
Foul smelling lochia111
Wound infection111

 

Table 12. Neonatal Outcome in Group I
 
VariablesMisoprostolDinoprostone
Birth weight (kg)2.712.74
Apgar score < 6 at 1 min22
Apgar score < 8 at 1 min22

 

Table 13. Neonatal Outcome in Group II
 
VariablesMisoprostolDinoprostone
Birth weight (kg)2.732.76
Apgar score < 6 at 1 min01
Apgar score < 8 at 1 min01

 

Table 14. Neonatal Morbidities
 
NICU admissionMisoprostol groupDinoprostone groupP value
Respiratory distress100.31
Early onset sepsis111
Birth asphyxia130.307