| Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access |
| Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc |
| Journal website http://www.jcgo.org |
Original Article
Volume 4, Number 4, December 2015, pages 302-306
Comparison of Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Gel for Induction in Prelabor Rupture of Membranes at Term
Tables
| Characteristic | Misoprostol (n = 25) | Dinoprostone (n = 25) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 22.2 | 21.4 | 0.899 |
| Gestational age (weeks) | 39 | 40 | 0.500 |
| Bishop’s score < 6 | 13 | 18 | 0.145 |
| Characteristic | Misoprostol (n = 25) | Dinoprostone (n = 25) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 25.6 | 26.1 | 0.566 |
| Gestational age (weeks) | 39 | 39 | 1 |
| Bishop’s score < 6 | 17 | 21 | 0.162 |
| Characteristic | Misoprostol (n = 50) | Dinoprostone (n = 50) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 23.02 | 23.09 | 0.867 |
| Gestational age | 38.40 | 38.26 | 0.899 |
| Bishop’s score < 6 | 30 | 39 | 0.05 |
| Number | Misoprostol group (n = 25) | Dinoprostone group (n = 25) | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | ||
| 1 | 19 | 76 | 23 | 92 | 0.122 |
| 2 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 0.384 |
| 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.148 |
| Oxytocin during labor | 5 | 20 | 6 | 24 | 0.732 |
| Number | Misoprostol group (n = 25) | Dinoprostone group (n = 25) | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | ||
| 1 | 22 | 88 | 21 | 84 | 0.683 |
| 2 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 16 | 0.683 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Oxytocin during labor | 3 | 12 | 2 | 8 | 0.637 |
| Total number of patients | Induction delivery interval (in h) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Misoprostol group | 25 | 7.748 ± 5.18 | 0.590 |
| Dinoprostone group | 25 | 7.07 ± 3.46 |
| Total number of patients | Induction delivery interval (in h) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Misoprostol group | 25 | 5.55 ± 3.9 | 0.301 |
| Dinoprostone group | 25 | 6.71 ± 3.8 |
| Total number of patients | Induction delivery interval (in h) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Misoprostol group | 50 | 6.652 ± 4.6 | 0.777 |
| Dinoprostone group | 50 | 6.89 ± 3.6 |
| Mode of delivery | Misoprostol group (n = 25) | Dinoprostone group (n = 25) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cesarean section | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| Vaginal delivery | 24 | 24 | 1.00 |
| Mode of delivery | Misoprostol group (n = 25) | Dinoprostone group (n = 25) |
|---|---|---|
| Cesarean section | 0 | 0 |
| Vaginal delivery | 25 | 25 |
| Adverse effects | Misoprostol group | Dinoprostone group | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea and vomiting | 1 | 2 | 0.557 |
| Diarrhoea | 4 | 0 | 0.041 |
| Hyperthermia | 1 | 2 | 0.557 |
| Uterine tachysystole | 2 | 1 | 0.557 |
| Chorioamnionitis | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Postpartum fever | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Foul smelling lochia | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Wound infection | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Variables | Misoprostol | Dinoprostone |
|---|---|---|
| Birth weight (kg) | 2.71 | 2.74 |
| Apgar score < 6 at 1 min | 2 | 2 |
| Apgar score < 8 at 1 min | 2 | 2 |
| Variables | Misoprostol | Dinoprostone |
|---|---|---|
| Birth weight (kg) | 2.73 | 2.76 |
| Apgar score < 6 at 1 min | 0 | 1 |
| Apgar score < 8 at 1 min | 0 | 1 |
| NICU admission | Misoprostol group | Dinoprostone group | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Respiratory distress | 1 | 0 | 0.31 |
| Early onset sepsis | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Birth asphyxia | 1 | 3 | 0.307 |