Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jcgo.org

Original Article

Volume 4, Number 2, June 2015, pages 212-216


A Study of Various Factors Influencing Fetal Scalp Lactate and Their Correlation With Composite Fetal and Neonatal Outcomes

Figure

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Relationship between fetal scalp lactate and gestational age at birth with linear regression line added.

Tables

Table 1. Demographic Characteristics for Study Population
 
CharacteristicsFSL < 4.8 mmol/L (n = 230)FSL ≥ 4.8 mmol/L (n = 96)Significance (P value)
FSL: fetal scalp lactate; IQR: interquartile range.
Median maternal age (IQR), years26 (23 - 31)28 (24 - 32)0.049
Nulliparous, no. (%)177 (77%)71 (74%)0.56
Median gestational age (IQR), completed weeks40 (39 - 31)40 (39 - 41)0.79
Median time in labor (IQR), h8.6 (5.3 - 11.6)6.2 (4.0 - 9.9)0.001
Median birth weight (IQR), g3,435 (3,120 - 3,770)3,345 (3,030 - 3,770)0.32

 

Table 2. Association of Fetal Scalp Lactate With Fetal and Neonatal Outcomes
 
OutcomesFSL < 4.8 mmol/L (n = 230)FSL ≥ 4.8 mmol/L (n = 96)Odds ratio (95% CI)Significance (P value)
The combined outcome included the presence of one or more of the following: umbilical artery pH ≤ 7.20, base excess of ≤ -12, Apgar score ≤ 7 at 1 or 5 min, presence of meconium (± operative delivery for fetal distress). FSL: fetal scalp lactate; CI: confidence interval; ODFD: operative delivery for fetal distress.
Operative delivery for fetal distress84 (36.5%)86 (89.6%)14.9 (7.37 - 30.3)< 0.001
Cord pH < 7.252 (22.6%)31 (32.3%)1.63 (0.96 - 2.77)0.067
Cord base excess ≤ -126 (2.6%)5 (5.2%)2.05 (0.61 - 6.89)0.311
1 min Apgar ≤ 769 (30%)47 (49%)2.23 (1.37 - 3.65)0.001
5 min Apgar ≤ 710 (4.3%)16 (16.7%)4.40 (1.92 - 10.10)< 0.001
Special care nursery admission62 (27.0%)33 (34.4%)1.42 (0.85 - 2.37)0.179
Meconium liquor97 (42.2%)35 (36.5%)0.79 (0.48 - 1.29)0.338
Combined outcome (including ODFD)184 (80.0%)95 (99.0%)23.8 (3.23 - 175)< 0.001
Combined outcome (excluding ODFD)163 (70.9%)75 (78.1%)1.47 (0.84 - 2.57)0.18

 

Table 3. Logistic Regression Analysis With Combined Fetal and Neonatal Outcome as Dependent Variable
 
Independent variableAll factorsSimplified model
Odds ratio (95% CI)Significance (P-value)Odds ratio (95% CI)Significance (P-value)
CI: confidence interval.
Fetal scalp lactate1.91 (1.42 - 2.55)< 0.0011.90 (1.44-2.51)< 0.001
Maternal age (years)1.00 (0.95 - 1.06)0.98--
Nulliparous1.36 (0.59 - 3.11)0.47--
Gestational age1.18 (0.92 - 1.52)0.20--
Time in labor (h)0.95 (0.89 - 1.02)0.14--
Birth weight1.00 (0.99 - 1.00)0.33--
Goodness of fit
  Nagelkerke R20.20-0.17-
  Hosmer and Lemeshowχ2 = 5.68, df = 80.68χ2 = 5.61, df = 80.69

 

Table 4. Logistic Regression Analysis With Combined Fetal and Neonatal Outcome (Excluding Operative Delivery for Fetal Distress) as Dependent Variable
 
Independent variableAll factors
Odds ratio (95% CI)Significance (P value)
There were no significant predictors after backward stepwise regression.
Fetal scalp lactate1.10 (0.98 - 1.25)0.12
Maternal age (years)0.98 (0.94 - 1.03)0.95
Nulliparous1.52 (0.81 - 2.88)0.2
Gestational age1.12 (0.92 - 1.36)0.28
Time in labor (h)0.96 (0.91 - 1.02)0.17
Birth weight1.00 (0.99 - 1.00)0.31
Goodness of fit
  Nagelkerke R20.039-
  Hosmer and Lemeshowχ2 = 9.05, df = 80.34