Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jcgo.org

Original Article

Volume 8, Number 1, March 2019, pages 17-20

Induction of Labor and Risk for Emergency Cesarean Section in Women at Term Pregnancy

Tables

Table 1. Baseline Demographic Details of the Subjects
 
Baseline demographicsNumberPercentage
GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; GHTN: gestational hypertension; IE: imminent eclampsia; IUD: intrauterine fetal demise; OLIGO: isolated oligohydramnios; PDP: post-dated pregnancy; PE: preeclampsia; PROM: premature rupture of membranes.
Age
  < 20 years3217.90%
  21 to 30 years14179.20%
  > 30 years52.80%
Parity
  Primigravida11262.90%
  Multigravida6637.10%
Bishop’s score
  142.2
  23016.8
  37039.3
  45329.7
  5179.5
  642.2
Gestational age
  37 - 38 weeks 6 days3519.50%
  39 - 40 weeks 6 days8849.40%
  41 - 42 weeks5530.80%
Indication for induction of labor
  GDM21.10%
  GHTN42.20%
  IE21.10%
  OLIGO10659.50%
  PDP4324.10%
  PE168.90%
  PROM42.20%

 

Table 2. Association Between Mode of Delivery and Induction Method
 
Mode of deliveryMisoprostolSyntocinonTotal
χ2 = 2.593, df = 2, P = 0.274.
Vaginal delivery1278135
Cesarean43043

 

Table 3. Mode of Delivery and Mean Induction Delivery Interval Between Both Groups
 
Mode of deliveryNumber of deliveriesMean induction delivery intervalP value
Vaginal delivery13512.21 h< 0.001
Cesarean4319 h

 

Table 4. Association Between Mode of Delivery and Baby Condition
 
Baby conditionVaginal deliveryCesarean
Chi-square test (χ2) = 47.07, df = 2, P < 0.001.
NICU1.5%38.5%