Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jcgo.org

Original Article

Volume 7, Number 1, March 2018, pages 1-12


Evaluating Women’s Satisfaction With Health Services Received During Childbirth: A Study of Hospitals in Athens, Greece

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Women’s education level and its association with hospital type (percentage).
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Participants’ professional status (percentage).
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Participants’ description of their birthing experience.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Participants’ satisfaction with their doctor (frequency/degree of satisfaction).
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Participants’ satisfaction with the midwife (frequency/degree of satisfaction).
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Participants’ satisfaction with the doctor and its association with type of delivery.
Figure 7.
Figure 7. Participants’ satisfaction with the midwife and its association with type of delivery.
Figure 8.
Figure 8. Differences in satisfaction with the doctor and midwife depending on the hospital type.

Tables

Table 1. Participants’ Demographic and Clinical Characteristics
 
ΝPercentage (%)
Average age (years)35.5 ± 4.6Public: 35
Private: 36.6
Basic trainingPrimary school (6 years)00
First secondary education school (gymnasium 3 years)32.2
Second secondary education school (lyceum 3 years)13697.8
Educational levelSecondary school graduate7050.4
Public: 49.5
Private: 52.4
Graduate higher education5338.1
Public: 38.1
Private: 38.1
Postgraduate studies1611.5
Public: 12.4
Private: 9.5
Professional statusFull-time employee5841.7
Public: 35.1
Private: 57.1
Part-time employee1812.9
Public: 12.4
Private: 14.3
Self-employed1913.7
Public: 11.3
Private: 19.0
Unemployed or fired128.6
Public: 11.3
Private: 2.4
In long-term sick leave10.7
Public: 1.0
Private: 0
On maternity leave or parental leave1410.1
Public: 14.4
Private: 0
Employed with household1712.2
Public: 14.4
Private: 7.1
Marital statusSingle42.9
Public: 0
Private: 9.5
In symbiosis1611.5
Public: 12.4
Private: 9.5
Married11683.5
Public: 86.6
Private: 76.2
Divorced or separated21.4
Public: 1.0
Private: 2.4
Widow10.7
Public: 0
Private: 2.4
Birth numberThe first7453.2
The second or above6546.8
Number of miscarriages or abortions010374.1
12618.7
275
321.4
400
510.7
Kind of current childbirthVaginal birth8158.3
Public: 56.7
Private: 61.9
Cesarean section5841.7
Public: 43.3
Private: 38.1
Birth preferenceWith vaginal birth12086.3
With cesarean section1913.7
Hospital of birthPrivate4230.2
Public9769.8

 

Table 2. Participants’ Marital Status and Its Association With Hospital Type
 
Marital statusPrivate hospital (%)Public hospital (%)
Single9.50
Cohabitating9.512.4
Married76.286.6
Divorced or separated2.41.0
Widowed2.40

 

Table 3. Participants’ Satisfaction With Healthcare Providers During Childbirth
 
NMinimum valueMaximum valueMiddle valueStandard deviation
Satisfaction with doctor1391.34.03.20.5
Satisfaction with midwife13904.03.10.7

 

Table 4. Correlation between age and satisfaction with the doctor and the midwife (Spearman correlation coefficient)
 
Spearman correlation coefficient (r)Satisfaction with doctorSatisfaction with midwife
Ager-0.1750.013
P-value (two-tailed)0.0390.881
N139139

 

Table 5. Correlation Between Participants’ Education Level and Satisfaction With the Doctor and the Midwife in the Private Hospital
 
Spearman correlation coefficientTotal satisfactionSatisfaction with doctorSatisfaction with midwife
Vocational education levelr-0.288-0.367-0.245
P-value (two-tailed)0.0650.0170.118
n424242

 

Table 6. Correlation Between Participants’ Education Level and Satisfaction With the Doctor and the Midwife in the Public Hospital
 
Spearman correlation coefficientTotal satisfactionSatisfaction with doctorSatisfaction with midwife
Vocational education levelr0.1090.1110.115
P-value (two-tailed)0.2870.2790.261
n979797

 

Table 7. Correlation Between Participants’ Childbirth Experience and Satisfaction With the Doctor and the Midwife
 
Spearman correlation coefficient (r)Degree of satisfaction with the doctorDegree of satisfaction with the midwife
Negative birth experiencer-0.361-0.308
P-value (two-tailed)< 0.0010.001
N139139

 

Table 8. Correlation Between the Information Participants Obtained From the Internet and Their Satisfaction With the Doctor and the Midwife
 
Information from the InternetnMeanStandard deviation
Degree of satisfaction with the doctor
  Yes1053.1600.571
  No323.4280.421
Degree of satisfaction with the midwife
  Yes1053.1120.606
  No323.3260.790
Degree of satisfaction with the doctorDegree of satisfaction with the midwife
Mann-Whitney U test1,224.51,137.5
P-value0.0200.006