Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.jcgo.org

Original Article

Volume 11, Number 3, September 2022, pages 75-85


A Novel Approach in Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders: A Single-Center Surgical Experience From Vietnam

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Myometrial part of uterus (yellow arrow) was removed accompanied with specimen of unseparated placenta (white arrow).
Figure 2.
Figure 2. (a) Transverse B-Lynch compressive suture after uterine resection. (b) Transverse B-Lynch procedure followed by uterine closure. Conservative surgery was evaluated successfully by uterine contraction and by reducing active bleeding.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Study flow chart. PASD: placenta accreta spectrum disorder; GA: gestational age.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. (a) Laparotomy by midline incision. Placenta was invasive deeply through myometrial layer to serosa. Placenta was visible via thin layer of uterus (white arrow). Placenta percreta was located at uterine body, closed to fundus. Newly formed blood vessels were clearly present at uterine serosa’s superficial surface. (b) Laparotomy by midline incision. Placenta was infiltrated robustly through uterine myometrium to serous membrane. Placenta percreta was located at lower segment of uterus, directed to bladder. Vascular angiogenesis developed strongly at anterior position of invasive placenta (yellow arrow).
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Frequency of placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PASD) in the present study. Unidentified PAS mentioned on severe invasive placenta confirmed accurately by experienced surgeon, leading to totally disappear of the myometrial layer at invasive placental location. Thus, pathologists could not conclude type of PASD in these cases. PAS: placenta accreta spectrum.

Tables

Table 1. Protocol of Uterine Conservative Surgery at Tu Du Hospital
 
Step 1: vascular disconnection of proliferative vessels and the separation of invaded uterine tissues from invaded vesical tissues.
Step 2: incision of the lower uterine segment at upper margin of placenta or cut through placenta, fetal delivery.
Step 3: resection of all invaded myometrial portion, manual removal of the whole placenta, or left partial placenta in situ, hemostasis of local bleeding vessels (Fig. 1).
Step 4: hemostasis by suture of transverse B-Lynch procedure (uterine compression suture), using atraumatic number 1 chromic catgut (Fig. 2a) [14].
Step 5: restore of uterine myometrium by one layer, not using suture of “U” shape (Fig. 2b).
Step 6: bladder repair if necessary.

 

Table 2. Characteristic of Demographic Study
 
FeaturesFrequency (n)Percentage (%)
SD: standard deviation.
Maternal age (mean ± SD)32.78 ± 5.19
  < 353960
  ≥ 352640
Number of previous cesarean scar
  034.6
  13858.5
  22335.4
  311.5
Gestational age at cesarean delivery (weeks) (mean ± SD)35.4 ± 2.1
  28+0 - 33+61015.4
  ≥ 34+0 - 36+64061.5
  ≥ 37+01523.1
Insertion of JJ catheter at cesarean delivery
  Yes5584.6
  No1015.4
Bilateral uterine artery ligation
  Yes6193.8
  No46.2
Selective ligation of vescical-uterine vessels
  Yes6193.8
  No46.2
Other hemostatic procedures
  Yes1421.5
  No5178.5
Intervention of bladder repair
  Yes34.6
  No6295.4
Duration from skin incision to fetal delivery (min) mean ± SD30 ± 18.8
Left partial placenta in situ7

 

Table 3. Characteristics of Neonatal Outcomes in the Study
 
Newborn outcomesFrequency (n = 65)Percentage (%)
SD: standard deviation; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; NIPPV: noninvasive positive pressure ventilation; ETT: endotracheal tube.
Weight of newborn infant
  Mean ± SD2,466 ± 515
  1,000 - ≤ 1,500 g34.6
  >1,500 - ≤ 2,500 g3553.9
  > 2,500 g2741.5
Apgar score at 1 min
  Low (0 - 3)710.8
  Middle (4 - 6)5584.6
  Normal (7 - 10)34.6
Apgar score at 5 min
  Middle (4 - 6)2335.4
  Normal (7 - 10)4264.6
NICU
  Yes4061.5
  No2436.9
  Delivery to tertiary neonatal hospital11.6
Postnatal intervention
  No need oxygen support1320.0
  Oxygen via nasal cannula2538.5
  CPAP1523.1
  NIPPV57.7
  ETT710.8
Infant status during postnatal course
  Alive5990.7
  Transferred to tertiary hospital69.3
  Death00

 

Table 4. Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications
 
Frequency (n = 65)Percentage (%)
aN = 57. SD: standard deviation.
Blood loss amount
  Mean ± SD, mL987 (677 - 1,531)
  < 500 mL812.3
  Grade I, II (500 - < 1,500) mL4366.2
  Grade III, IV (1,500 - < 3,000) mL1116.9
  ≥ 3,000 mL34.6
Ureteral injury (at stage of insertion of JJ catheter)11.5
Tubal sterilization2843.1
Operation time
  Mean ± SD, min135 ± 31.8
  < 120 min2233.8
  120 - 180 min3960.0
  > 180 min46.2
Postoperative hemorrhage, relaparotomy with conservative management11.5
Postoperative hemorrhage, relaparotomy with hysterectomy11.5
Postoperative infection, medical therapy, no need of more surgical intervention23.1
Postoperative infection, relaparotomy with hysterectomy23.1
Postpartum course (days)
  Mean ± SD5.79 (4.66 - 7.11)
  < 75381.5
  7 - ≤ 141116.9
  > 1411.5
Blood transfusion volume (mL)a
  Red blood cells831 ± 672
  Fresh frozen plasma446 ± 158
  Platelet250

 

Table 5. Type of PASD Related to Features of Surgery, Blood Loss Amount
 
FeaturesHistopathological result
Unidentified PAS n (%)Placenta accreta n (%)Placenta increta n (%)Placenta percreta n (%)Total n (%)
PAS: placenta accreta spectrum.
Surgery
  Elective10 (16.9)4 (6.8)20 (33.9)25 (33.9)59 (100.0)
  Emergency0 (0.0)1 (16.7)2 (33.3)3 (50.0)6 (100.0)
Blood loss amount
  < 1,500 mL9 (20.5)2 (4.5)15 (34.1)18 (40.9)44 (100.0)
  ≥ 1,500 mL1 (4.8)3 (14.3)7 (33.30)10 (47.6)21 (100.0)