J Clin Gynecol Obstet
Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jcgo.org

Case Report

Volume 4, Number 4, December 2015, pages 314-315


Intrapartum Diagnosis of Idiopathic Constriction Ring Dystocia

Shunji Suzukia, b, Sayuri Kondoa

aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
bCorresponding Author: Shunji Suzuki, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital, 5-11-12 Tateishi, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo 124-0012, Japan

Manuscript accepted for publication December 07, 2015
Short title: Constriction Ring Dystocia
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jcgo380e

Abstract▴Top 

We present here a case of idiopathic constriction ring dystocia. In the case, an intrapartum ultrasonography showed a thickening of the anterior wall of the uterus during labor. Cesarean section identified the constriction ring of the uterine myometrium strangling the fetal neck at 3 - 4 cm above the Bandl’s contraction ring.

Keywords: Constriction ring; Dystocia; Bandl’s contraction ring; Ultrasonography

Introduction▴Top 

Obstructed labor or labor dystocia is a common emergency in obstetrics; however, dystocia due to uterine rings is a rare phenomenon. A constriction ring has been reported to be a localized tetany of the uterus that occurs in prolonged labor with rupture of the membranes [1]. It is usually localized to a thickened area of the myometrium over a point of fetal body or at a level just below it [1-3]. Therefore, it is differentiated from the Bandl’s contraction ring (also known as pathological retraction ring) which is the abnormal junction between the two segments of the human uterus and also associated with the dysfunctional and prolonged labor or fetal head malposition [1, 4, 5]. Recently, some cases of ultrasonographic observation of Bandl’s contraction ring have been reported [4, 5]. In these cases, a thickening of the anterior wall of the uterus has been detected at the level of the lower uterine segment [4, 5]. We present here a case of constriction ring dystocia. In the case, an intrapartum ultrasonography showed a thickening of the anterior wall of the uterus during labor at above the Bandl’s contraction ring.

Case Report▴Top 

A 32-year-old parous (gravida 2, para 1) Japanese woman at 38 weeks was admitted at our hospital in labor following premature rupture of the membranes. She delivered a healthy female baby weighing 3,312 g (Apgars 9/10) without any obstetric problems at 30 years old. At admission, she was in active labor with regular contractions of the uterus occurring every 2 - 3 min. Examination revealed advanced cervical dilatation, effacement, but high station (5 cm/80%/-3) during the interval of the labor pains. During the acme phase of the labor pains, the fetal head was lifted to the higher station (-4 to -5). An ultrasound evaluation identified occipito-posterior presentation of the fetus and oligohydramnion (amniotic fluid index: 1 cm). A thickening of the anterior wall of the uterus was detected between the fetal head (jaw) and shoulder (Fig. 1). The size and shape of the ring were unaffected by contractions. Dystocia due to constriction ring or contraction ring (Bandl’s contraction ring) was suspected. Possible interventions including tocolysis using nitroglycerin or magnesium sulfate were discussed with the patient, and she selected a cesarean delivery. A female infant weighing 2,834 g with Apgars 9/9 was delivered by cesarean section. Surgeons identified the constriction ring of the uterine myometrium strangling the fetal neck at 3 - 4 cm above the Bandl’s contraction ring (Fig. 2). After the deliveries of the fetus and the placenta, the constriction ring disappeared. There was no intrauterine septum or synechia. Her puerperium was uncomplicated.

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Ultrasonographic view of the uterine constriction ring (arrow) in a case of obstructed labor.

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. Constriction ring around the fetal neck in a case of obstructed labor.
Discussion▴Top 

The occurrence of constriction ring will be one of the causes of maternal near miss and unexpected obstructed labor.

To date, the reports of the ultrasonographic observation of constriction ring dystocia have been rare. In the current case, the position of the ring was observed to be at above that of Bandl’s contraction ring; however, the thickened myometrium appearing as a homogeneous layer between the serosa and the decidua in the constriction ring by ultrasonography seemed to be very similar to that of Bandl’s contraction ring reported previously [1, 4, 5]. In this case, however, no thinning of the lower uterine segment was observed at the time of cesarean. The thickness of the uterine wall above and below the ring seemed to be approximately equal [1]. This finding may be different from that in Bandl’s contraction ring associated with excessive thinning of the lower uterine segment leading to the increased risk of uterine rupture. Unfortunately, in this case we did not check this point by ultrasonography; however, this may be one of the differential points in the ultrasonographic examination for the management of the two types of ring dystocia. If we had diagnosed this case as constriction ring dystocia clearly, we may have a possibility to recommend tocolysis strongly on the informed consent.

This may be the first observation of the changes in station of the fetal head during obstructed labor due to constriction ring. If the fetus is strangulated by the uterus during labor, the fetus may be lifted during the acme phase of the labor pains. To date, the pathogenesis of constriction ring dystocia has not been well documented. In this study, some possible conditions associated with the mechanisms leading to the occurrence of constriction ring dystocia can be proposed such as occipito-posterior presentation of the fetus and oligohydramnion [1]. The elucidation of the pathogenesis and accurate diagnostic methods of constriction ring dystocia is needed by accumulation of the same case reports.

Grant Support

This study received no funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


References▴Top 
  1. Greenhill JP. Constriction ring dystocia. In: Greenhill JP (ed) Obstetrics. Asian ed. 13th ed. Igaku Shoin Ltd., Tokyo & Osaka, 1965, pp 838-839.
  2. Jeanty P, Johns R, Boehm F. Uterine ring and fetal demise. J Ultrasound Med. 1989;8(11):635-638.
    pubmed
  3. Kaye CH. Constriction ring dystocia. Can Med Assoc J. 1974;110(5):535-538.
    doi
  4. Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Weiner CP. Ultrasonographic observation of Bandl's contraction ring. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;86(1):35-36.
    doi pubmed
  5. Tinelli A, Di Renzo GC, Malvasi A. The intrapartum ultrasonographic detection of the Bandl ring as a marker of dystocia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 in press.
    doi pubmed


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

     

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 

 

 

 

Journal of Clinical Gynecology & Obstetrics, quarterly, ISSN 1927-1271 (print), 1927-128X (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal, the authors retain the copyright, the journal is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jcgo.org   editorial contact: editor@jcgo.org    elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.