Induction of Labor and Risk for Emergency Cesarean Section in Women at Term Pregnancy

Gomathy Ethiraj, Aditi C. Ramachandra, Sandhya Rajan

Abstract


Background: Induction of labor has become one of the most common interventions in obstetrics, and because of this we have the increasing number of Cesarean sections. Identifying these risk factors which increase the risk of Cesarean section has become important so that we can induce patients putting them in lower risk of Cesarean section. Cesarean sections should be audited using the obstetrical concepts and parameters for induction of labor.

Methods: A prospective case-control study has been conducted among pregnant women between 37 - 42 weeks of gestation, who were recruited from the labor ward for a period of 1 year. All women enrolled for the study were clinically examined to assess for Bishops score, obstetric scan and cardiotocography (CTG). Induction was done using tab misoprostol 50 µg 6th hourly for a maximum of four doses in 24 h and augmented with oxytocin if required. In our tertiary hospital in Kolar district of Karnataka we decided to conduct a study with a sample size of 178 patients. We assessed the risk factors in term pregnancies and their delivery outcome following induction. Baseline demographic details along with pregnancy risk factors were taken into account. Induction agent as well as induction to delivery interval with those that underwent Cesarean section was also taken into account. Pregnancy outcome was determined.

Results: This study concluded that significant risk factor for Cesarean was primigravida with fetal distress due to oligohydramnios, compared to other risk factors such as preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, post-dated pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus. Bishops score prior to induction was < 6. Out of these women 43 underwent Cesarean after induction in view of fetal distress for non reassuring nonstress test (NST). Primigravida had a risk of 4.4 times for Cesarean after induction, and absence of oligohydramnios was a protective factor in the study with odds ratio of 0.2.

Conclusions: Induction of labor at term has reduced the number of Cesarean sections in our study with a single risk factor.




J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2019;8(1):17-20
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo433w


Keywords


Induction of labor; Cesarean section; Term pregnancy; Risk factor

Full Text: HTML PDF
 

Browse  Journals  

     

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 

 

 

 

Journal of Clinical Gynecology & Obstetrics, quarterly, ISSN 1927-1271 (print), 1927-128X (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal, the authors retain the copyright, the journal is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jcgo.org   editorial contact: editor@jcgo.org    elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.