Evaluating Womens Satisfaction With Health Services Received During Childbirth: A Study of Hospitals in Athens, Greece

Pavlos I. Sachsanidis

Abstract


Background: Cooperating with healthcare providers during childbirth plays a vital role in women satisfaction with their received health services. Therefore, womens satisfaction with their doctor/midwife during childbirth was assessed and its corresponding factors with the aim of improving health services were identified. The differences concerning users of public and private hospitals were also examined.

Methods: The Kuopio Instrument for Mothers (KIM) (Greek version) questionnaire was used to measure the satisfaction of 139 postpartum women (after either vaginal or cesarean births) who gave birth at either public (n = 97) or private hospitals (n = 42) in the greater Athens area.

Results: Participants mean age was 35.5 years; 50.4% were secondary school graduates, 38.1% had higher education, and 11.5% had a postgraduate degree; 83.5% were married; 41.7% worked full-time, 8.6% were unemployed, and 12.2% were housemakers. Almost half (41.7%) had a cesarean section; however, most (86.3%) wished to have had a vaginal birth. Generally, most women were satisfied with the healthcare services provided during childbirth, with more women reporting satisfaction with doctors versus midwives. Moreover, satisfaction was directly correlated with age, past birthing experience, and the information that women received during their pregnancy from the Internet. Women were more satisfied if they had a vaginal delivery rather than a cesarean section. Less educated women were more satisfied with their doctor than their more educated counterparts. Women who gave birth in private, rather than public hospitals, were also more satisfied. Other factors such as family and economic situation, the number of previous births, and a history of miscarriages or abortions did not affect women’s satisfaction.

Conclusions: Most women reported a great desire to express their opinions during childbirth; therefore, hospitals should distribute satisfaction questionnaires to postpartum women before they are discharged. In addition, healthcare providers should improve their communication with women during childbirth, emphasizing necessary information concerning how the birth is progressing. Finally, when they can be done safely, vaginal births should be promoted over cesarean sections. Future research should work to strengthen the knowledge we have about postpartum women’s satisfaction during childbirth.




J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2018;7(1):1-12
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo475w

/p>


Keywords


Participants’ satisfaction; Vaginal childbirth; Cesarean section; Postpartum women; Obstetrician; Midwife

Full Text: HTML PDF
 

Browse  Journals  

     

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 

 

 

 

Journal of Clinical Gynecology & Obstetrics, quarterly, ISSN 1927-1271 (print), 1927-128X (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal, the authors retain the copyright, the journal is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jcgo.org   editorial contact: editor@jcgo.org    elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.