Female Perspectives Regarding Quality of Care and Weight-Related Communication in Obstetrics-Gynecology and Family Practices

Elizabeth Culberson, Lisa Kellar, Rose A. Maxwell, Miryoung Lee, Leah D. Whigham, Steven R. Lindheim

Abstract


Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the perspectives of patients with elevated body mass index (BMI) regarding the quality of care, communication, and the clinical office environment provided by obstetrics-gynecology (OBGYN) and family practices (FP) outpatient practices.

Methods: A cross-sectional 20-question survey was administered to female patients (18 years) with BMI 25 kg/m2 at academic practices of OBGYN and FP clinics. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests were computed to assess differences by specialty. Unadjusted and adjusted ordinal regression analyses were conducted to assess factors associated with patient satisfaction with care.

Results: Responses from 330 patients (150 OBGYN and 180 FP) were included. The majority of women were between the ages of 31 and 50 (44.5%), reported BMI with class III obesity category (41.5%), and had a high school diploma or less (67.4%). Regarding clinical environment, a higher proportion of OBGYN patients (36.7% vs. 12.5%, P < 0.001) reported weight scales not being located in a private setting compared with FP patients. A higher proportion of OBGYN patients than FP patients (15.0% vs. 7.9%) felt their physicians were not understanding of what it meant to have overweight/obesity (P = 0.014) and felt their physician was uncomfortable when discussing weight-loss treatments (14.2% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.009). However, a higher proportion of FP patients than OBGYN patients (14.2% vs. 6.2%) were dissatisfied with the overall level of care (P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in the quality of treatment, level of courtesy and respect utilized during treatment.

Conclusion: Perceptions of weight-related communication and the clinical environment were significantly worse by OBGYN compared to FP patients with elevated BMI. However, satisfaction with overall level of care was significantly higher for OBGYN patients compared to FP patients. This suggests a continued need for training related to weight stigma and best practices for creating a welcoming environment in OBGYN clinics.




J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2024;13(2):25-34
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo953

Keywords


Obesity; Bias; Education; Primary care; Obstetrics and gynecology; Family practice

Full Text: HTML PDF
 

Browse  Journals  

     

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 

 

 

 

Journal of Clinical Gynecology & Obstetrics, quarterly, ISSN 1927-1271 (print), 1927-128X (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal, the authors retain the copyright, the journal is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jcgo.org   editorial contact: editor@jcgo.org    elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.